“My New V—– Won’t Make Me Happy”

This op-ed, the title of which I discreetly edited for my heading, published in The New York Times on November 24, quickly fueled a storm of conversation about trans persons, surgeries, insurance coverage, and oh so much more. You can read it here:

Andrea Long Chu begins with this: “Next Thursday, I will get a vagina. . . . Until the day I die, my body will regard the vagina as a wound; as a result, it will require regular, painful attention to maintain. This is what I want, but there is no guarantee it will make me happier. In fact, I don’t expect it to. That shouldn’t disqualify me from getting it.”

If Chu were looking to be provocative, to gain a name for herself, she nailed it. But if she wanted to be helpful—

  • helpful to other trans folks,
  • helpful to those who are weighing whether to have surgeries or begin HRT,
  • helpful to those who are pondering bringing loved ones into their tightly held secret that they suffer gender dysphoria,
  • even to be helpful to ultra-conservative trans-deniers that they might come to understand trans persons

—then I find her to have laid a big, fat egg.

And the egg isn’t only on her face. It’s all over transgender persons and the transgender conversation.

From what Chu wrote about her experience on hormones, I wouldn’t expect her to be overly optimistic that she will be happier after gender affirmation surgery. She wrote this: “I feel demonstrably worse since I started on hormones.” And this: “Like many of my trans friends, I’ve watched my dysphoria balloon since I began transition.” And this: “I was not suicidal before hormones. Now I often am.”

Truly, I am befuddled why Chu transitioned, or, when recognizing these dramatic negatives, she continued.

And who are her trans friends? I’ve not heard these things from the many trans women and trans men I’ve gotten to know.

And I went through gender affirmation surgery. My neo vagina healed nicely. If my body reckons it as a wound, it hasn’t informed me that it does. And, painful attention to maintain the neo vagina? Yeah, there is some pain. For awhile.  It wears off.

Sheesh, Andrea. Talk about painting something as negatively as one can.

All of this might arise from her mindset. Earlier in the piece, she wrote, “I like to say that being trans is the second-worst thing that ever happened to me. (The worst was being born a boy.)” [parentheses hers] I understand this thinking and have written about it. Since the mind is the quarterback of the body, it calls the shots, and if a person identifies as female, then the easy, even automatic, response is to wish the body conformed to the brain. But why not the other way around? Could not Chu just as easily, from another mindset, have written the following? “The worst was being born with a mismatch of brain and body. Oh, that I could always have felt that I am a boy to match my body!”

Before writing how she feels worse since starting hormones, Chu says it is wrong for a person to think that feeling better will accompany transitioning. But isn’t that the entire point of transitioning? Isn’t it improved health which is behind every aspect of the process, to get the mind and body and the way one lives into alignment so that one feels better?

When I undertook living full time as a female—and, if you are curious, what happened with me, this year, resuming living as a male, is unrelated to any of this conversation—my twins demons were addressed. My suicidal thoughts almost entirely resolved; only rarely did a short term one pop up. The fear I had, that I would lose my mind—which had grown so severe, so real, that I often thought it would happen any given day—was entirely extinguished.

If I could sit with Andrea Long Chu, I would softly and compassionately ask her why she continued with her transition, and why she is going through with having her genitals reformed. From her essay, for the world of me it seems that she is doing all of this to prove a point, which she makes toward the end of her essay, and on which I comment in my concluding paragraphs.

I’ve read one response from a trans person, who noted that Chu doesn’t speak for all trans folks. She sure doesn’t. To me, not only is Chu not on the same playing field with the transgender population, she’s not even observing from the bleachers.

Chu seems to have forgotten a vital point, especially when someone lives in a way which is controversial—in this case, transgender—and discusses a topic which is controversial—here, gender affirmation surgery and all of the other aspects of transitioning—and writes about it publicly, and all the more so in a world-wide-read publication such as The New York Times: Chu doesn’t speak for all of us, but many—especially the trans-deniers—will hear her as doing so.

I feel that she threw all of us under the struggle bus.

I am confident she submitted this with the desire to do good, to benefit others. I find that she completely and utterly failed.

Chu concludes her essay: “There are no good outcomes in transition. There are only people, begging to be taken seriously.”

Yes, Andrea, every trans persons longs to be taken seriously, and who are you to suggest that there are no good outcomes in transition? Do you not see that your former assertion negates your latter point?

If a thing will not have a good outcome, why do the thing? If a thing will not have a good outcome, isn’t that a thing from which we run, a thing we avoid, a thing to be set aside in search of a thing which will produce a good outcome?

We figure out Chu’s thesis along the way but, finally, nearing the conclusion, she states it: “Let me be clear: I believe that surgeries of all kinds can and do make an enormous difference in the lives of trans people. But I also believe that surgery’s only prerequisite should be a simple demonstration of want.”

There it is. “A simple demonstration of want.” I want it, therefore I get to have it.

No, Andrea Long Chu. Not a simple demonstration of want. Need? You betcha. Need, for the purpose of healing and improved health? You betcha.

Advertisements

11 thoughts on ““My New V—– Won’t Make Me Happy”

  1. Thanks for your post. I felt exactly as you but felt completely (and appropriately) unqualified to respond. I hope you sent a letter to the NYT and commented on the article as well.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks so much for reading, Rick, and for the quick response. I’m sitting here, this very moment, wondering whether I should do as you suggest. My being post-trans . . . will it be used against trans folks? Do I write a disclaimer? How to handle it?

    I only want to help trans folks, and I fear doing harm. If you have an idea, I’m all ears.

    Like

    1. Every story is different. No one life is like another. I feel your rebuttal is point on and should be heard. But that’s me. You’ll make a wise decision.

      Like

  3. Great post Greg, you handled it very well.

    I find it hard to believe that the NYT would even print this and i find it very disturbing. I find it more disturbing that her therapist would even approve her for the surgery. It sounds like she isn’t truly transgender and has a personality disorder that needs to be looked at first.

    Like

    1. Teresa, I understand that this is sickening to you, and to many. I certainly would have preferred never to have suffered gender dysphoria that I am in this position to talk about these things. Sadly, this is a very real, terrible malady – just as real as the one you suffer. Yet, because this one attacks sex and gender, it is very volatile. For you all, who do not understand it, it is sickening and gross and disgusting. For us, who live it, it is life and death, and we have to deal with it head-on.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. It sickens me when someone wants to belittle another and throws down their Christian-card so self-righteously. I don’t believe that God wants us to defend His honor by being self-righteous, judgemental, unkind, and just plain mean. Where is the compassion? Where is the kindness? Where is the love? We know no one is perfect, but we expect it anyway. Except in ourselves. We often excuse our own shortcomings because we claim God’s grace. But then we turn around and demand others be perfect—a standard we ourselves don’t meet.
    Mathew 7:1-2.

    One of my shortcomings? My big mouth. I know this. I am aware of it. I pray every single day for God’s forgiveness and ask Him to fill my heart with love, compassion, and forgiveness of other’s lack of all of those qualities, but gosh darnit, when someone strikes out to hurt someone I care about and then condones their very wickedness by inferring Christianity, my momma-bear-claws come out and I want to scratch someone’s eyes out and make them see! Is that ever an oxymoron?! Haven’t I just done that which I am calling someone else out for? Perhaps, but I own it. I have lots of work to do on me and I pray that God will be patient with me on my journey to becoming as kind, loving, forgiving and compassionate as you, G. You, my friend, are such an inspiration to me. I strive each day to be more like Jesus, to be the kind of person that God will be proud to call His own, to be more like you, G.! God bless you!

    Like

    1. My dear friend Lory, your concern and affection always strengthen me . . . not to mention just about the best oxymoron I’ve ever heard – scratch out someone’s eyes to make them see! 🙂

      Thank you for your heart, and for putting it on your sleeve for me, which is for a whole lot of US!

      Godblessyouback!

      Like

Leave a Reply to sara19719 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s